Joint Working Group 1 (JWG 1)
The International Organization
for Standardization
The United Nations Economic
Commission for Europe


UN/EDIFACT Syntax Implementation Guidelines

UN/EDIFACT Syntax Implementation Guidelines




2.1   Standards
2.2   Interface with the In-house System
2.3   Software
2.4   Communications

3.1   Introduction
3.2   Initial Development and Design
3.3   User Manual
3.4   Check List for the Interchange Agreement
3.5   Interchange Maintenance Authority



6.1   Data elements
6.2   Segments
6.3   Messages

7.1   Definition of a UNSM
7.2   Definition of a Sub-set of a UNSM
7.3   UN/EDIFACT Directory Set Issue Numbers
7.4   Message Version & Release Numbers for UNSMs and for
        Subsets of UNSMs
7.5   User Conventions for the Implementation of Sub-sets of
7.6   User Conventions for the Implementation of UNSMs under

8.1   Interchange Structure
8.2   Use of the Character Set
8.2.1 Relationship to syntax control characters
8.2.2 Level A & Level B syntax separators
8.3   Interchange Formatting Rules
8.3.1 Interchange structure
8.3.2 Service string advice - UNA
8.3.3 Interchange control header - UNB
8.3.4 Interchange control trailer - UNZ
8.3.5 Functional group structure
8.3.6 Functional group header - UNG
8.3.7 Functional group trailer - UNE
8.3.8 Message structure
8.3.9 Message header - UNH
8.3.10 Message trailer - UNT
8.3.11 Section control segment - UNS

9.1   Segment Composition
9.2   Absence of Data
9.2.1 Absence of a segment
9.2.2 Absence of data within a segment
9.3   Suppression of Non-significant Characters
9.4   Negative Values
9.5   Repeated and Nested Segments
9.5.1 Repeating segments
9.5.2 Comparison of implicit and explicit representation
9.5.3 Repeating groups of segments
9.5.4 Message branching diagrams


11.1  Rapporteur Contact Points


The purpose of these guidelines is to assist Electronic Data
Interchange (EDI) users with their implementation of the
ISO-UN/EDIFACT (EDI for Administration, Commerce and
Transport) Syntax Rules, and to expand some of the rules contained
in ISO 9735, supported by examples.

The guidelines are a part of a set of complementary documents
available to users.  The other documents in the series which users
should be aware of are:-

 - UNTDED   : The United Nations Trade Data Elements Directory
              (also published as the International Standard ISO
              7372) and associated code sets

 - ISO 9735 : The EDIFACT Syntax Rules standard

 - The UN/EDIFACT Message Design Guidelines

 - The UN/EDIFACT Directory Set, containing directories for:

   UNEDMD - Internationally agreed UN/EDIFACT Standard Messages

   UNEDSD - UN/EDIFACT Standard Segments for UNSMs

   UNEDCD - UN/EDIFACT Composite data elements for UNSMs

   UNEDED - UN/EDIFACT Data Elements for UNSMs

   UNEDCL - UN/EDIFACT Code List for UNSMs

UNTDED is published separately by the UN, and maintained jointly with
ISO.  The remaining documents are compiled in the UN Trade Data
Interchange Directory.

In 1987, following the convergence of the UN and US/ANSI syntax
proposals, the UN/EDIFACT Syntax Rules were approved as an ISO
standard, having been developed within and submitted for approval
by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's Working
Party on the Facilitation of International Trade Procedures
(UN/ECE WP.4).

At the same time, WP.4 appointed three Rapporteurs to co-ordinate
the continuing work in conjunction with the UN/ECE Secretariat.
The Rapporteurs appointed were from Poland (co-ordinating the
views and input from CMEA countries), from the United Kingdom
(co-ordinating on behalf of the EEC and EFTA countries), and the
United States (on behalf of the US and Canada).  Additional
Rapporteurs may be appointed in the future.

In particular, the UNECE Secretariat and the Rapporteurs,
supported by Advisory and Support Teams, will be the focal point
for maintenance of the UN/EDIFACT Syntax Rules and for proposals
for new UNSMs (or for amendments to existing UNSMs).  The agreed
maintenance procedures can be found in the Message Design
Guidelines document, as can the contact points for the

Under NO circumstances should users, software providers, or
network providers make any changes to the UN/EDIFACT Syntax Rules
as defined in ISO 9735.  Change requests should be registered
either direct to the UN/ECE Secretariat, or via one of the
Rapporteurs, (or by use of ISO procedures) for international
discussion and approval, both at the UN and in the ISO.

>From the outset of the development of the UN/EDIFACT techniques,
certain important design criteria were adhered to.  These were
that the techniques should be independent of the computers to be
used, the systems using them, the applications using them, the
communications methods to be used, and the data to be
interchanged.  The fact that there are a range of live and pilot
applications, using a broad spectrum of mainframe, mini and micro
computers, utilising a range of different computer communications
protocols, (such as 2780, 3780, SNA/DNA, packet switching etc.),
different systems solutions (including one-to-one direct
interchange and mailbox switching), demonstrates that the
criteria have been met.

In addition to the above, UN/EDIFACT is designed to have the
minimum impact upon the in-house systems using the technique.
Many live applications constructing data for transmission of
UN/EDIFACT messages, use a technique of creating a simple serial
file - often structured to hold records containing data
equivalent to that required for segments of data in the messages.
This file is then submitted to a formatting routine, which
constructs the data according to the UN/EDIFACT syntax.

Experience has shown that for both converting from the in-house
file layout into UN/EDIFACT Syntax for transmission, and for
converting back into the required in-house layout on receipt of
an EDIFACT structured transmission, parameter (or table) driven
routines have proven to be very effective.  When receiving a
transmission for translation, by using such routines, it is
possible for the recipient to ignore any data which is of no
interest to him for his own in-house needs.

It is stressed that UN/EDIFACT is a user application protocol for
use within user systems, which is compatible with the OSI model,
in that it presents user data for transmission via the services
described by the model.

A common technique is for users to have their own in-house
written routines (or a software package), for formatting and
de-formatting UN/EDIFACT structured transmission files.  All of
this is user data, which is then submitted to a proprietary
communications protocol (such as 2780, 3780, X25 etc) as defined
in the User Interchange Agreement.

              |            Agreement                 |
              |                                      |
              |                                      |
   +-----------------------+              +-----------------------+
   | USER 'A' SYSTEM       |              | USER 'B' SYSTEM       |
   |.......................|              |.......................|
   | EDIFACT formatting and|              | EDIFACT formatting and|
   | de-formatting routine |              | de-formatting routine |
   |.......................|              |.......................|
  +|-----------------------|+            +|-----------------------|+
  || Communications        ||            || Communications        ||
  || protocol              ||            || protocol              ||
  |+-----------------------+|            |+-----------------------+|
  |   APPLICATION LAYER     |            |   APPLICATION LAYER     |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   PRESENTATION LAYER    |            |   PRESENTATION LAYER    |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   SESSION LAYER         |            |   SESSION LAYER         |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   TRANSPORT LAYER       |            |   TRANSPORT LAYER       |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   NETWORK LAYER         |            |   NETWORK LAYER         |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   DATA LINK LAYER       |            |   DATA LINK LAYER       |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
  |   PHYSICAL LAYER        |            |   PHYSICAL LAYER        |
  |                         |            |                         |
  +-------------------------+            +-------------------------+
              |                                      |
              |                                      |


2.1 Standards

    Without strict adherence to the published UN/EDIFACT standards,
    many of the achievable benefits will be lost.

    The UN/EDIFACT Syntax Rules (ISO 9735), set the standards for
    structuring data into segments, segments into messages, and
    messages into an interchange.

    Data, segment and message standards are equally essential

    The United Nations Trade Data Elements Directory (UNTDED) sets
    out the standards for administration, commerce and transport
    data.  Where appropriate it also recommends codes for coded
    representation of data (often internationally maintained codes),
    and for qualifiers. Since UNTDED is also an ISO standard (ISO
    7372), they are maintained jointly by the UN and ISO.

    Because of the repetitive nature of information required in each
    of the sectors for which UN/EDIFACT has been designed, it is pos-
    sible to assemble logically related data elements into standard
    segments, which can then be used in several different messages
    meeting the requirements of related business functions.  An
    example of this can be found by examining United Nations Standard
    Messages (UNSMs), such as the Commercial Invoice, the Purchase
    Order and the Despatch Advice.  Such standard segments are
    published in the UNSM Standard Segments Directory, with other
    segments specific to certain messages.

    Finally, UNSMs are published in the UN/EDIFACT Message Directory.
    The procedures for the maintenance of the UN/EDIFACT Syntax and
    the directories (including how users can propose
    changes/additions to existing segments/messages, and proposals
    for new UNSMs) are contained in the Message Design Guidelines.

    As far as possible, (providing the required function has been
    covered) users should try to use existing UNSMs.  At first sight,
    users may find that some UNSMs appear unnecessarily complex.
    Upon closer examination however, it will be found that many (and
    in some cases, most) of the segments and groups of segments are
    defined as being "Conditional".  This is because the messages
    have been designed for International and National use, by
    multi-industry sectors.

    Since conditional segments may be completely omitted from a
    message, a user's requirements can often be met by use of a
    relatively smaller percentage of the segments specified in a
    UNSM.  Should this prove not to be the case, then the Message
    Design Guidelines must be studied.

2.2 Interface with the In-house System

    Once having settled on the message standard to be used, users
    must then carry out a careful analysis of their in-house system
    with respect to the data requirements for the message in

    This will entail ensuring that all of the data which must be
    provided for the application in which the message is being used,
    (which could include data defined as conditional, as well as
    mandatory data), can be supplied from the in-house system.  If
    not, some way must be found for doing so.  (In some cases,
    certain elements of data can be held on a "parameter" file--see
    Section 2.3).

    For receipt of EDI messages, clearly users must decide how the
    data is to be processed.  (For example, can a Purchase Order
    message be taken directly into an existing in-house order
    processing system, or should some intermediate processing and
    perhaps re-ordering of data be carried out first?).

    For both transmission and receipt of EDI messages, attention
    should also be paid to any codes specified for use in the
    messages.  These may not equate exactly with those used in the
    in-house systems, and some form of code conversion may be
    required.  This can be particularly important if data not
    previously integrated between in-house applications are to be

2.3  Software

    Software of one kind or another is needed to format data from
    in-house systems into the message and syntax structure, and to
    reverse the process into a form required by in-house systems.

    This can either be developed in-house, or proprietary software
    packages can be obtained.  In-house development can be a quick
    way of getting an application off the ground for one or two
    messages, but generally will not be cost effective as more EDI
    message are introduced into the application - mainly because the
    routines are usually coded to be message dependent.  This can
    cause maintenance difficulties as messages are amended and
    enhanced over a period of time.

    Software packages are available from a variety of sources,
    ranging from data capture systems to interface translators. Most
    are message independent, generally by use of table-driven
    techniques.  If message content changes, this means that only the
    tables have to be amended, not the main modules of the package.

    As previously identified, on some occasions users may find that
    the required data are not always available from the in-house
    system.  For formatting of data for transmission, this can be
    true, particularly for some of data required for certain of the
    syntax service segments (e.g. the Interchange Header - UNB; and
    the Functional Group Header - UNG).  It could also be true if for
    example, the full name and address of the organisation
    originating the data is required in the interchange in order to
    meet some form of legal requirement.

    A useful technique for solving these problems is to hold such
    constant data on a small parameter file, which can be accessed
    when required during the message formatting process.

2.4 Communications

    Some form of communications carrier is the last essential basic
    element for implementation of EDI applications.

    Some applications still exchange magnetic tapes, but
    increasingly, telecommunications techniques are being used. Two
    options are available--either direct communications, or via a
    third party service.

    Direct point-to-point or dial-up techniques may suffice if
    interchange partners are few in number, and their
    telecommunications protocols are identical.

    However, as the number of interchange partners increases, as
    the number of different telecommunications protocols have to be
    catered for, and as scheduling problems become more acute, it
    may well be found that the services offered by a range of network
    providers become a possible alternative.

    Although the services offered may vary in detail, most offer
    network communication, the interface to the network, protocol
    conversion services (i.e. data is provided using a preferred
    telecommunications protocol and it is a function of the network
    provider's service to convert to the protocols to those of the
    interchange partners), and mailbox/clearing-house services.

    Users of mailbox/clearing-house services send data to the network
    provider, who interrogates the header segment of each interchange
    in order to deposit the data in the mailbox of the appropriate
    addressee specified in the interchange header segment.  Each
    recipient can then access his own mailbox to retrieve data.  This
    can be a particularly useful facility if scheduling problems are
    acute, or if data is being exchanged across time zones.

    When joining an existing user group, it may be found that the
    choice of communications techniques has already been made by the
    group as a whole.


3.1 Introduction

    Virtually every live data interchange application operates under
    an interchange agreement, which normally takes the form of a
    user manual.

    Once created, this has to be maintained in the same way that any
    computer system user manual has to be.

    The type of controlling agency authority created varies from
    application to application.  For example, in Customs interchange
    applications, it is the Customs authority itself which normally
    controls and maintains the necessary user documentation.  Other
    examples include trade associations, trade facilitation
    organisations, and a secretariat created and funded by the trade

3.2 Initial Development and Design

    While it is impossible to specify precisely the technique which
    should be used for the initial development and design of
    interchange systems, some guidelines can be given, based upon an
    analysis of the techniques used for existing systems.

    A typical technique used is to create a steering committee
    chosen from a selection of users from the application area.  A
    series of working sub-groups, each charged with a specific task,
    report to the steering committee as they progress their work. In
    turn, these sub-groups are formed from users, having the
    necessary expertise for the task in hand.

    The following list of tasks are typical of those which have been
    carried out by existing user groups.  More detailed subjects
    might need to be included, depending upon the application area,
    and two or more of the tasks might be undertaken by one

    A typical list of tasks for a specific application could be:

    - to identify the functions - and therefore the types of
      messages (or transactions) to be interchanged, with reference
      to the agreed application data element directory and with
      particular emphasis on the mandatory or conditional status of
      each data element within each transaction.  Since users in
      different application areas may wish, in the future, to
      interchange data, wherever possible standardisation of message
      types and structure within each application area will be to
      everyone's advantage.

    - to identify the data elements required, element sizes and
      formats, element terminology, and to compile a user data
      element directory.  (This would normally be done with
      reference to the UN Trade Data Element Directory insofar as
      international data elements are concerned).  For national, or
      industry specific data elements, local agreement would be

    - to identify the functions of user data segments required,
      making full use of the UNSM Standard Segments Directory,
      particularly with respect to standard user data segments
      designed for multi-industry/multi-application use.  Should
      new user data segments need to be designed, the
      recommendations contained in the UN EDIFACT Message Design
      Guidelines should be followed, with "Change Requests" being
      submitted to the local Rapporteur's Advisory & Support Team
      as necessary.

    - to specify the level of syntax rules to be used by the
      application, (i.e. Level A or B - see ISO 9735).

    - to specify the method(s) to be used for the physical
      transmission of data within the application, including where
      relevant, the specification of requirements for magnetic tape
      transfer, for floppy disks transfer, and for
      telecommunications protocols.

    - to identify any legal and security problems related to the
      transfer of information, which might require resolution.  (It
      should be noted that the UN/ICC UNCID recommendations -
      "Uniform Rules of Conduct for the Interchange of Trade Data" -
      address all legal questions which need to be considered.
      UNCID is included in the UN Trade Data Interchange Directory).

    - to identify and recommend common coding techniques to be
      implemented by all participants in the user group.

    - to identify and recommend encryption techniques (if required).

    - to recommend the form and period of a trial phase of testing,
      prior to full implementation.

3.3 User Manual

    Taking account of the above subjects, it is recommended that the
    user manual should at least include:

    - a description of the level of EDIFACT syntax to be used

    - a description of the agreed character set to be used

    - a full and detailed description of the structure of message
      types to be used.  (As far as possible, it is stressed that
      UNSMs should be used - or if not exactly suitable - that the
      procedures for amendment set out in the Message Design
      Guidelines should be followed).

    - the user data element directory (utilising UNTDED as far as

    - the user segment directory (utilising the standard segments
      defined in EDSD as far as possible)

    - the user message directory

    - a specification of legal/security requirements to be observed.

    - a description of the communications service(s) to be utilised.

    - a specification of the transmission record length to be
      used (which must be standard within the application area)

    - a indication of the techniques to be used for error correction,
      acknowledgements, etc

    - an indication whether or not Functional Grouping is to be used.

    - an indication of the type of encryption to be used (if any).

    - an indication of the type of password facility to be used
      (if any).

3.4 Check List for the Interchange Agreement

    An Interchange Agreement (normally in the form of a User Manual)
    governs all of the participants subscribing to the application
    interchange which it describes.

    Separate bi-lateral agreements between participants in such an
    interchange application are not recommended, since they only
    serve to defeat the purpose of the standards specified for all
    users in the Interchange Agreement.

    For certain data fields in the Service segments which form the
    syntax, the Interchange Agreement must specify the code sets,
    lists of qualifiers, etc to be used.  The fields and the
    criteria to be addressed are listed below, with the service data
    element reference number and the segment in which it appears, in
    brackets after the field name.


    The Interchange Agreement (IA) must specify whether a name or
    code should be used to identify the organisations sending data.
    If a code, the various code sets must be identifiable by use of
    qualifiers, which must be specified.


    The IA must specify whether a name or code should be used to
    identify recipients.  If a code, the various code sets must be
    identifiable by use of qualifiers, which must be specified.


    The IA must state if the field is to be used.  If so, either a
    list of passwords must be maintained, or (more likely), senders
    must ascertain from their various partners what reference or
    password is to be provided.


    The IA must state whether the field is to be used, if so, it
    must state what information should be carried in the field.


    The IA must state whether the field is to be used, if so, a list
    of codes and meanings must be provided.


    The IA must state whether the field is to be used, if so,
    whether a name or code should appear.  If a code, its value must
    be provided.


    The IA must either inform users either that it is their own
    responsibility to maintain code lists (plus qualifiers if
    necessary) for their partners, or it should publish and maintain
    agreed lists for all participants.


    The IA must provide the list of codes which could be used
    (although within one interchange application, it is most likely
    that only one code would be used.  For example, if UNSMs are
    being used, the code would have the value UN).


    If UNSMs are being used, the current version number (and if
    necessary, the release number) of the message in question should
    be specified.  If the application is using other than UNSMs,
    then the IA must publish the version numbers (and release
    numbers if necessary) - see Section 7 Identification and
    Control of messages.


    The message identifier field has 5 component data elements.  The
    value of each of these must be specified as necessary per
    message type in the IA, according to the procedures set out in
    Section 7, dealing with the identification and control of

3.5 Interchange maintenance authority

    It is strongly recommended that some form of interchange
    maintenance authority be created.  Such an authority would be
    responsible for the control and maintenance of the interchange
    agreement, with particular responsibility for the production and
    circulation of amendments to the user manual, and for control
    of change-over to new versions of messages.


For the definitions of the terminology used in this document,
please see Annex A of the ISO 9735 standard.


In order to cover the range of user preference, two levels of
syntax are identified with respect to use of character sets.
These levels are defined in the Interchange Header (UNB) segment
(in the data element S001 Syntax Identifiers) as UNOA (for the
basic level A), and UNOB for level B.

The full character set for both levels is specified in ISO 9735
EDIFACT Syntax Rules.

Level B only, may use a higher level character set taken from ISO
646 IRV, including the use of three of the IS 1-4 non-printable
separator characters in place of the printable separator
characters used in Level A, as defined in ISO 9735. However, it
should be clearly understood that users of Level B must revert to
Level A if this is necessary to meet the capability and wishes of
the recipient.

Care should also be taken regarding the use of the IS 1-4
separator characters with respect to certain communications
protocols.  (For example, if the 2780 protocol is used, certain
of the IS characters are not passed through to the application
level process.  In this case, use of the Level A set will
overcome the problem).

If not otherwise agreed between interchange partners, the "bit"
representation of the recommended character set for
computer-to-computer interchange for both Level A and B is the
seven-bit representation specified in the basic ISO 646

Binary coded decimal or other forms of hardware/software
dependent character representation (for examples EBCDIC) must not
be used for interchange (other than by prior agreement between
interchange partners), as these features are not available, or
are not dealt with in the same way, in all makes of computers.

International Reference Version (IRV) ISO 646-1983 (E)

            |b7    |  0 |  0 | 0  | 0  |  1  |  1 |  1  | 1  |
            |b6    |  0 |  0 |  1 |  1 |  0  |  0 |  1  | 1  |
            |b5    |  0 |  1 |  0 |  1 |  0  |  1 |  0  | 1  |
+--------------|   |    |    |    |    |     |    |     |    |
|b4| b3| b2| b1|   |  0 |  1 |  2 |  3 |  4  |  5 |  6  | 7  |
|0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NUL| DLE|  SP|  O |  @  |  P |  `  | p  |
|0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | SOH| DC1|   !|  1 |  A  |  Q |  a  | q  |
|0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | STX| DC2|   "|  2 |  B  |  R |  b  | r  |
|0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ETX| DC3|   #|  3 |  C  |  S |  c  | s  |
|0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | EOT| DC4| $  |  4 |  D  |  T |  d  | t  |
|0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | ENQ| NAK|   %|  5 |  E  |  U |  e  | u  |
|0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ACK| SYN|   &|  6 |  F  |  V |  f  | v  |
|0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | BEL| ETB|   '|  7 |  G  |  W |  g  | w  |
|1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | BS | CAN|   (|  8 |  H  |  X |  h  | x  |
|1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | HT | EM |   )|  9 |  I  |  Y |  i  | y  |
|1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10| LF | SUB|   *|  : |  J  |  Z |  j  | z  |
|1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11| VT | ESC|   +|  ; |  K  |  [ |  k  | {  |
|1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12| FF | IS4|  , |  < |  L  |  \ |  l  |  | |
|1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13| CR | IS3|   -|  = |  M  |  ] |  m  |  } |
|1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14| SO | IS2|   .|  > |  N  |  ^ |  n  | ~  |
|1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15| SI | IS1|   /|  ? |  O  |  _ |  o  | DEL|

Specified by the standard and widely implemented

|  2 |  B  |
|  3 |  C  |

Specified by the standard, but not implemented by all manufacturers
| STX|
| ETX|
| EOT| DC4|

Specified by the standard, but implemented with varying bit patterns

      | p  |
|  a  | q  |
|  b  | r  |


An interchange of data in the context of EDIFACT, is composed of
one or more messages containing segments which in turn are made
up of data elements.

6.1 Data Elements

  (NOTE:  It is stressed that all the examples of data
          which follow in this paper are examples.  UNTDED
          should be studied to obtain the current formats,
          code set and qualifier values, etc).

    A data element may consist of a single data item, e.g. "2310
    Delivery month" in which case it is called a simple data
    element, or it may consist of several data items, e.g. the
    composite data element "C198 PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION" which
    consists of two data elements, 7020 Article Number and 7823
    Article Number Qualifier. In this case it is called a composite
    data element; each data item within a composite data element is
    called a component data element.

    A component is identified by its position within a data
    element.  For example, if a data element was required to express
    the cost of insurance, it would be defined as a composite data
    element with two component data elements.  In the first position
    would be "5486 Insurance Cost", accompanied by "6345 Currency
    Code" as the second component.

    The data elements referred to in the EDIFACT standard are either
    user data elements or service data elements.

    User data elements contain the substantive data which are to be
    transmitted.  They are outside the scope of the standard and
    should be defined and agreed (preferably based on the UN trade
    data element directory - TDED) between interchange partners, and
    specified in a user data element directory.

    Service data elements contain data required for structuring the
    transmission.  A list of the service data elements provided in
    this standard and their detailed descriptions are given in the UN
    Trade Data Element Directory (TDED), in the 'S' and the '000'
    series.  They will also be found in ISO 9735.

    Data elements can only be transmitted within a segment.

    Each data element in TDED is allocated a unique 4-digit
    numeric tag.  In addition, each data element is allocated a
    unique and mnemonic four-character data element identifier which
    must be alphabetic.  These identifiers can be used in internal
    systems, e.g. for system and programming documentation.

6.2 Segments

    There are two types of segments: User Data segments and Service
    segments.  Conditional Segments containing no data must be
    omitted from the message in which they would normally appear.

    User data segments contain data elements such as amounts,
    values, names, places and other data to be transmitted.  The
    contents of user data segments are outside the scope of the
    UN/EDIFACT Syntax standard.  User data segments must not be
    created with the first two letters of the tag "UN", as these are
    reserved for use in service segments.

    Service segments contain service data elements such as sender
    of the transmission, syntax rules type and level, date of the
    preparation of the transmission, priority type, etc. and/or
    other specific data which are required for the transmission. All
    service segment tags start with the two letters "UN" which are
    reserved for this purpose.  On no account should users change
    service segments.  A "Change Request" procedure is described in
    the Message Design Guidelines for the purpose of proposing
    amendments. The following categories of service segments are
    provided in the UN/EDIFACT syntax standard:

      Transmission structuring syntax segments, which are used
      to assemble transmissions in a standard way, e.g. to start
      and end each transmission, to start and end each message
      within a transmission, and to start and end functional
      groups of messages within a transmission (if this facility
      is required).

      Segments used in the Service messages "CONTRL" & "APERAK",
      which respectively are used for acknowledgements requests,
      for correction of syntax errors and rejections, and for
      confirmation of receipt or requests for correction of
      application errors.  (The latter - APPLIC - is under

      A segment used in the General Purpose Message "GENRAL",
      which is used to indicate the type, title and references
      for the message.

    Segments are identified by a code which uniquely identifies each
    segment as specified in a segment directory.

    A list of the service segments provided in the EDIFACT syntax
    standard, with detailed descriptions, is given in Annex B of ISO

6.3 Messages

    A Message consists of a number of segments structured in
    accordance with the syntax rules.  It must begin with the
    service segment "UNH -Message header" and end with the service
    segment "UNT - Message trailer".  It must contain at least one
    user data segment, containing at least one user data element.

    There are two classes of messages:  User messages and EDIFACT
    Service messages.

    User messages contain the user data segments required for
    the message in addition to the "Message header" and
    "Message trailer" segments.

    There is an option to transfer a message progressively. At the
    time of the first transmission, it generally would not contain
    all of the information as defined in the interchange application
    message specifications, other than the data defined as being
    mandatory within the message. In this case, the originator may
    transmit a selection of the data elements at first, followed by
    a second (or successive) transmission(s), adding to or updating
    the data previously transmitted, the data being related by means
    of a structured, unique key.

    (An example might be a Booking message, where the transport
    operator needs a rough estimate of the space required for the
    shipment as early as possible to facilitate his planning.  The
    precise details may be supplied by the originator later as they
    become available, until finally the transport operator has
    sufficient data to create a bill of lading).

    The use of the progressive message transfer technique is
    explained in more detail in Section 8.3.9 of this guide.

    UN/EDIFACT Service messages contain service segments for error
    correction, either at the syntax protocol level, or at the
    application level, and service segments for general free
    text. Their use is explained in Section 10 of this guide.

    Messages are uniquely identified by a message identifier
    field consisting of five component data elements, used to
    effect identification and control of messages, as explained in
    the next Section.

7.  Identification & Control of UN/EDIFACT Messages

The information in this section and, in particular that on
version/release, no longer conforms to the existing Syntax
implementation guidelines which need revision in light of the
decision at the March 1994 session of WP.4 to implement
Standard and Draft directories.

Paragraphs where changes have been made are marked at the
beginning with an *

7.1 Definition of a UNSM

    A United Nations Standard Message (UNSM) is one which:-

    i)   has been registered, published, and which is maintained
         by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe;

    ii)  has the values contained in the Controlling Agency,
         Message Type, Message Version Number and Message
         Release Number fields (the requirements for the use
         of which are specified in ISO 9735), allocated and
         controlled by the UN/ECE;

    iii) always has the code value "UN" in the Controlling
         Agency field.

7.2 Definition of a Sub-set of a UNSM

    A Sub-set of a UNSM is a message which is directly derived
    from an approved UNSM, has the same function as the UNSM from
    which it is derived, and which:

    i)   contains all of the groups and segments defined as
         having a mandatory status within the message, and the
         mandatory data elements within them.  There shall be no
         change to the status, order or content of the groups,
         segments, and composite data elements and data elements
         contained within the segments.

         (It should be noted, however, that although many UNSMs
         contain Conditional Groups of segments which may contain
         one or more mandatory segments, providing the complete
         conditional group is omitted from the sub-set, this
         does not break the rule regarding the inclusion of
         mandatory segments);

    ii)  does not change the status, order or content of the
         segments, composite data elements and data elements
         in the conditional segments chosen for use from the

    iii) does not add any segments, composite data elements or
         data elements to the message;

    iv)  contains the identical values specified for use in the
         Message Type, Controlling Agency, Message Version
         Number and Message Release Number fields, as are
         specified for the UNSM from which the sub-set is

7.3 UN/EDIFACT Directory Set Issue Numbers

    It is essential that messages should be capable of being
    identified in relation to the current version of the
    directory from which they are derived, (i.e. the code lists,
    data elements, composite data elements and segments).

*   Whenever a new Standard directory set is published it contains
    the message specifications for all registered UNSMs
    and their supporting segments, composites, data elements and

*   A directory will be identified by an issue number, allocated
    and controlled under UN/EDIFACT procedures.  The issue number
    will be a single Character indicating if the directory contains
    Draft or Standard material (S or D) followed by a period
    separator, followed by the last two digits of the year in which
    the directory is agreed, followed by a sequential alpha
    character assigned by the UN/ECE.  This sequential alpha
    character begins with A at the start of each year and is
    incremented if more than one directory of the same type (S or
    D) is published during the same year.

7.4 Message Version & Release Numbers for UNSMs and for Subsets of

    Refer to section 4.2.5 of UNTDID.

7.5 User Conventions for the Implementation of Sub-sets of UNSMs

    United Nations Standard Messages are structured in such a way
    that they can be used by companies and organisations in many
    different industries.  For example, the invoice UNSM contains
    data elements and segments which are in common use in the
    majority of invoicing applications. Other data elements and
    segments specified for use in the message have a more
    restricted application, and will probably be required by only
    a few industry applications.  Thus, in the vast majority of
    cases, industries will choose and become responsible for
    specific industry related sub-sets from the total message
    structure.  (The definition of a true sub-set defined above).

    However, still abiding by this principle, users may wish to
    go beyond the standard sub-set definition, and for reasons of
    integrity, agree between a group of participants that certain
    data elements and/or segments which are conditional in a UNSM
    should always be required in their application.  In choosing
    to go beyond the true sub-set definition set out in paragraph
    2 above, users must bear in mind that to comply with the
    spirit of sub-sets, any sub-set must always be more
    restrictive than its parent UNSM.

    To provide a unique identification for any particular sub-set
    of a UNSM, users may wish to assign a code for use in the
    "Association assigned code" field of the UNH and/or UNG
    segments.  Further, if it is considered that there may be a
    problem in assigning a code which may be duplicated by
    another group of users, it is suggested that the local
    Rapporteur's Team be consulted regarding the allocation of a
    code value.

7.6 User Conventions for the Implementation of UNSMs under Amendment

    As UNSMs are used by more industries, it is quite likely that
    some messages will be found not to cover some of the specific
    requirements of those industries.  To provide these
    requirements so that the messages can be used, immediate
    changes to (or additions of) segments and elements may be
    necessary by use of the official UN/EDIFACT "Change Request"

    Since the standards maintenance time-scales may delay the
    implementation of the required modifications to the UNSM for
    some time, users may wish to implement the changes
    immediately so that the message can be used in their

    In order to identify the amended message (which then is NOT a
    UNSM) during the interim period, the user group concerned
    should consider including an appropriate code in the
    "Association assigned code" field of the UNH and/or UNG
    segments.  Where it is thought that there may be problems of
    duplicated Association assigned code values, the local
    Rapporteur's Team should be consulted regarding the
    allocation of a code value.

    As an alternative, in order to identify the group of users
    requesting the amendments to the UNSM, in the interim period
    of use of the message, the "Controlling Agency" data element
    should be used for this purpose.

8.  Basic UN/EDIFACT Syntax Rules

The UN/EDIFACT syntax rules apply only to the data to be interchanged.

They are independent of the type of computer to be used for the
interchange application, whether mainframe, mini or micro.

They are also independent of the data to be interchanged and the
data standards in use; new data elements or data segments can be
introduced and existing data elements and data segments changed
(by use of the maintenance procedures) without affecting the rules.

The syntax rules are independent of both the type of application
(i.e. commercial, governmental, transport etc.), and of the
telecommunications protocols or interchange media to be used.
For example, a range of different applications are successfully
using them on packet switched services, SNA, 2780, 3780,
magnetic tape etc.  Therefore it can be seen that the data to be
interchanged sits inside the "envelope" provided by the data
communication transport service.

8.1 Interchange Structure

    As previously defined, in the syntax rules data elements are
    carried in user data segments, while service segments contain
    service data elements which form the structure of the syntax rules

    In OSI terms, a connection could include one or more EDIFACT
    interchanges, each separated from the other by control service
    segments which identify the start and end of each interchange.
    Within each interchange, there is then a hierarchical structure
    which allows for both control and identification of data for
    processing.  This structure is shown in Section 6 of ISO 9735.

    The syntax deals with the representation of the syntax protocol
    and user data only, and not with the requirements of the technical
    transmission aspects of telecommunications protocols, media
    labels, etc.

    Further, it should be pointed out that UN/EDIFACT in no way
    encroaches upon the OSI concept.  In an UN/EDIFACT interchange,
    everything from the first character of the Interchange Control
    Header segment to the last character of the Interchange Control
    Trailer segment, is user data, emanating from one computer system
    in a structure agreed by the users, for receipt into another
    computer system at the application level.

8.2 Use of the character set

    In general, all of the characters specified in the User Inter-
    change Agreement, (see section 3), can be used in data.

8.2.1 Relationship to syntax control characters

      If Level A syntax is being used,, it is recommended that the
      following four characters of the recommended character set,

      - the plus sign ( + )
      - the colon ( : )
      - the apostrophe (')
      - the question mark (?)

      should not deliberately be chosen for use in data elements,
      as they are reserved for use within the EDIFACT syntax rules
      rules as syntax characters for Level A.

      However, it should be pointed out that in practice in live
      applications, this causes few problems, because they rarely
      appear in genuine data. If they do, it is a relatively trivial
      task for the program which formats the data into the syntax
      structure to insert a release character where appropriate, and
      for the program which de-formats the data to remove the release
      character - thus permitting that character to be passed on to
      the recipient's system as a character which is part of the user

8.2.2 Syntax separators, terminator and release character

      |            Name &               |  Separator    | Separator  |
      |     Function of Separator       |  in Level A   | in Level B |
      |      Segment terminator         |               |            |
      | (To terminate all segments.  A  |       '       |   ISO646   |
      | data element separator must not |  (apostrophe) |    IS4     |
      | be used after the last data     |               |            |
      | element in a segment.)          |               |            |
      |      Segment tag and data       |               |            |
      |       element separator         |       +       |    ISO646  |
      | (To separate all segment tag    |  (plus sign)  |     IS3    |
      | service data elements from the  |               |            |
      | first user data element in the  |               |            |
      | segment, and to separate simple |               |            |
      | and/or composite data elements  |               |            |
      | in a segment from each other.)  |               |            |
      |         Component data          |               |            |
      |       element separator         |       :       |    ISO646  |
      | (To separate all component      |    (colon)    |     IS1    |
      | elements in a composite data    |               |            |
      | element from each other.)       |               |            |
      |       Release character         |               |            |
      | (To release any of the charac-  |       ?       |            |
      | ters + ; ' ?  appearing in user |(question mark)|  NOT USED  |
      | data in Level A syntax.         |               |            |
      | It MUST immediately precede     |               |            |
      | the character in question       |               |            |
      | and signifies that the NEXT     |               |            |
      | single character is not to      |               |            |
      | be interpreted as a syntax      |               |            |
      | separator, terminator, or       |               |            |
      | release character.)             |               |            |


Level A syntax separators

     where: NAD is the unique segment code for a Name and Address
          BY is a qualifier meaning "Buyer", thus identifying
          the function of the NAD segment
          ABC to 9NW is a composite data element

Level A release character


     Where:  In the users system, the first data element appears as
          75+73+ABC and the second data element appears as HOW
          MANY PACKAGES?

     The release character is not counted as part of the length of
     any data element or component data within which it is
     transmitted.  Release characters can be inserted by program so
     that data can be input and output without any special manual

Level B syntax separators

Note: The information separators IS1; IS3 and IS4 are described and
      their coded representation specified in clause 4 of ISO 646.
      They are control characters and thus non-printable.  However,
      in the example below they are shown in brackets thus (IS1) to
      illustrate their use.


8.3 Interchange formatting rules

8.3.1 Interchange structure

      As previously defined, service segments contain service data
      elements which are required at the application level for
      interchange or syntax control.

      A set of user interchange data must start with a "UNA Service
      String Advice" if for any reason neither the Level A or B the
      syntax separators, as defined in the standard, are used in the
      interchange which follows.

      If it is possible that the application may have to process
      interchanges preceded by the UNA string, you must ensure that
      your de-formatting software can process the data, which
      effectively is using "non-standard" separator characters.  One
      technique for achieving this is to have a routine which, when the
      UNA string is detected, dynamically updates the module which
      processes and checks the syntax separator characters.

      The set of user interchange data following the service string
      advice (if used) must start with the service syntax segment
      "Interchange Control Header" which has the segment code UNB.

      The set of user data must be terminated with the the
      "Interchange Control Trailer" which has the segment code UNZ.

      If several sets of user interchange data are included in one
      transmission, (i.e. there are several pairs of UNB and UNZ
      segments), each UNB segment must be preceded by a delimiter
      string advice if neither Level A or B separators are being used.

      With the exception of these service segments used to delimit a
      transmission (and two other service segments which are used to
      identify functional groups within a transmission), all data in a
      transmission must be interchanged within a message.

      A transmission may contain one message or any number of

      A transmission in general form can therefore be depicted as:

           +——— UNB segment
           |        message(s)
           +——— UNZ segment

      The syntax rules do not specify the order in which messages of
      different types should be transmitted within an interchange.
      The sender can forward messages in an order of his choosing,
      unless partners in an interchange application agree otherwise,
      or unless otherwise stated in the Interchange Agreement.

8.3.2 Service string advice - UNA

      The string has a mandatory fixed length of 9 characters.  The
      first three are UNA, immediately followed by the 6 characters
      as defined in ISO 9735.

      NOTE: ONLY in very special circumstance, (for example, at level
            A Syntax, if a user application group were interchanging
            only data related to mathematical equations, or, at level
            B syntax, if it were found that any IS character from
            ISO646 had been utilized for a specific function by a
            network or by a communications protocol), should any other
            delimiters than those detailed for Levels A and B be used.

8.3.3 Interchange control header segment - UNB (See ISO 9735
      Annex B for detailed specification)

      In addition to the segment code UNB, the following mandatory
      service data elements must be included in the following order:
        . the syntax identifier and version number;
        . the interchange sender;
        . the interchange recipient, plus an optional
          (normally coded) sub-address for onward routing;
        . the date and time of the transmission; and
        . the interchange control reference.

      Some, or all of the following conditional service data elements
      can be included in the segment, if specified for use in the
      Interchange Agreement.  If included, they must be in the
      following order:
        . the recipient's transmission reference (or password
          to be provided by the sender);
        . the application reference;
        . the processing priority code;
        . an acknowledgement request;
        . the communications agreement identification; and
        . a test indicator.

      (The recipient's transmission reference field may optionally be
      used to contain a password instead of a transmission reference).
      Clearly, such use must be specified in the Interchange
      Agreement.  It may be required for example, where a group of
      users are interchanging their data via a bureau mailbox service,
      or where a password is needed to gain access to the recipient's
      system. If functional grouping is being used in the interchange,
      the facility exists to include a password in each group header.
      To gain access to the recipient's sub-systems, if required.

      As identified in Section 2, some of the above data may not be
      held in the in-house system.  If not, it can be provided at
      run-time via a parameter file.

      The last field in the segment, the "Test Indicator", is used
      during the run-up phase to live working, since its use enables
      the recipient to identify all the data contained in the
      interchange as for trial use only. Clearly, care must be taken
      to set the field to zero as soon as live interchanges are
      started. An example UNB segment containing all of the
      conditional data elements and using level A syntax would be
      transmitted as:



      UNB    is the segment tag code.

      UNOA:1 identifies version 1, level A of the syntax rules
             and Controlling Agency UNO.  (For level B, the
             field would contain UNOB:1).

             The purpose of the version number is to allow for
             maintenance of the standard.  Each future amendment,
             or groups of amendments to the syntax, will cause the
             version number to be incremented by 1.

      123:AB:PO168 identifies the sender of the transmission in code
             with a qualifier of AB to identify the code set being
             used, followed by a code representing a reverse routing
             address to which the recipient should address any reply.

      3572:DN:B1342 identifies the recipient of the transmission in
             code (qualified by DN), plus a sub-address code. The
             sub-address code for onward routing may be used if the
             functional grouping facility, (which also provides for
             sub-addressing), is not used.

      771206:1215  771206 is the date and 1215 is the time of the
             preparation of the transmission. This is the
             date/time that the interchange is assembled for

      A143   is the unique interchange control reference for this
             transmission, allocated by the sender of the interchange.

      B26AZ  is recipient's reference, or a password. (This
             can be accompanied by a qualifier component
             element, if so specified in the Interchange
             Agreement) the field is left blank if not used

      DELINS is an example of an application reference.
             A common usage of this field is to keep all
             messages of the same type within one unique
             transmission, and to carry the appropriate
             message identifier in this field. Such usage
             allows a transmission of a particular message
             type to be retrieved by the recipient from a
             mailbox service in advance of transmissions
             containing a different message type.  The
             technique would not be used if either Functional
             Grouping or an interchange containing a mixture
             of different message types were being used, in
             which case it would be left blank.

      X      is a processing priority code, using a code
             defined in the Interchange Agreement (or left
             blank if not used)

      1      indicates that the sender is requesting an acknowledge-
             ment for the interchange, but only that the recipient
             has successfully received and identified the header and
             trailer segments (UNB & UNZ) for the interchange.  The
             recipient would reply, using a "CONTRL" message (see
             Section 10).  Such an acknowledgement does not mean that
             the contents of the interchange have been processed
             correctly and are acceptable to the recipient.  The field
             is set to zero if an acknowledgement is not required.

      CANDE  is an example of a code specified in the Interchange
             Agreement, which identifies the type of communications
             agreement under which the interchange is controlled, (or
             left blank if not used).

      1      indicates that this is a test transmission.  The field is
             set to zero for transmission of live data

8.3.4 Interchange control trailer segment - UNZ (See ISO 9735
      Annex B for detailed specification

      In addition to the segment code UNZ, this control segment
      contains two mandatory service data elements.  The first, the
      interchange control count, contains either a count of the number
      of messages in the interchange, or a count of the number of
      functional groups in the interchange if that facility has been
      used (see Section 8.3.5).

      The second data element, the interchange control reference,
      contains the identical reference to that carried in the same
      field of the UNB interchange header segment for the same
      interchange. Checking that the two fields are identical ensures
      that the set of interchange data has been successfully received.

      A UNZ segment which indicates a transmission with an interchange
      control reference of A143, containing 7 functional groups, would
      be transmitted as:  UNZ+7+A143'

      For a transmission with the same reference where functional
      grouping has not been used, and which contains 2500 messages,
      the UNZ segment would be transmitted as:  UNZ+2500+A143'

8.3.5 Functional group structure

      Messages in a transmission can be assembled into one or more
      functional groups.  For interchanges of data to/from North
      America, the use of functional grouping is mandatory. For other
      interchange applications, its use is optional, but should be
      specified in the interchange agreement.

      It is not permitted to mix the use of functional groups with
      messages not contained within functional groups in the same

      Each functional group must begin with the control service
      segment "Functional Group Header" which has the segment code UNG.
      Each functional group must end with the control service segment
      "Functional Group Trailer" which has the segment code UNE.

      An interchange consisting of a single functional group of "n"
      messages can therefore by depicted as:

     +——— UNB segment
     |    +— UNG segment
     |    |  
     |    |  
     |    |  first message
     |    |  .......
     |    |  "n-th" message
     |    |
     |    +— UNE segment
     +——— UNZ segment

An interchange consisting of "n" functional groups, can be
depicted as:

     +——— UNB segment
     |    +——— UNG header of the 1st functional group
     |    |
     |    |       messages
     |    |
     |    +——— UNE trailer of the 1st functional group
     |    +——— UNG header of the 2nd functional group
     |    |
     |    |       messages
     |    |
     |    +——— UNE trailer of the 2nd functional group
     |        ...
     |    +——— UNG header of the "n-th" functional group
     |    |
     |    |       messages
     |    |
     |    +—— UNE trailer of the "n-th" functional group
     +——— UNZ segment

8.3.6 Functional Group header - UNG (See ISO 9735 Annex B
      for detailed specification)

      The main benefit of the use of functional grouping is that it
      permits large organisations which have several functional
      processes, (e.g. purchasing, invoicing etc) or data processing
      centres (for example at a divisional or departmental level), to
      create their own identifiable application level envelopes,
      which can also be addressed from the originating department to
      a department in the recipient's system.

      An example functional group, (which has the segment code UNG),
      could be transmitted as:



      UNG         is the segment tag code

      INVOIC      is the functional identification, used to
                  identify the one message type contained within
                  the functional group

      15623       is the Application Sender's Identification, which
                  is a code identifying a specific division,
                  department, section, etc., which has originated
                  (or is responsible for) the messages contained
                  in the functional group.  If necessary, the data
                  element can contain a second component of a
                  qualifier, to identify the code set being used.

      23457       is the Application Recipients Identification, a
                  code identifying a specific division, department,                    section, etc., to which the messages in the functional                     group are finally destined. If necessary, it too can be                    qualified by a second component to identify the code set
                   being used.

      860606:1835 is the date and time that the functional group
                  of messages was assembled.  (NOTE that the time,
                  and perhaps the date, will often be earlier than
                  the date and time carried in the UNB interchange
                  header segment).

      CD1352      is a unique reference number for the functional
                  group, assigned by the division, etc., which
                  originated the group of messages

      UN          is the controlling agency code (see Section 7),
                  which identifies the agency responsible for the
                  production and maintenance of the message
                  standards for the message type contained in the

      89:1        is the version and release number of all of the
                  messages in the group, which must all be the
                  same message type.  This composite data element
                  could contain one additional component data
                  element for an association assigned code. It
                  should be noted that if conditions also demand
                  the presence of a number in the association
                  assigned code field, the same data for the
                  composite need not be repeated in the equivalent
                  fields of the Message Header (UNH) service
                  segment preceding each message in the Functional

                  Usage is fully explained in Section 7.

      A3P52       is an application password, and is the only
                  conditional data element in the segment, all the
                  rest being mandatory.  The password is only used
                  if specified in the interchange agreement (or if
                  agreed bi-laterally) and could, for example, be
                  used to gain entry to the recipient's sub-system
                  which will process the functional group

      The example above shows the typical use of the functional group
      facility, however, it should be noted that the facility for
      grouping messages of the same type together may still be used
      without using the internal system addressing capabilities from
      and/or to sub-systems in the sender and/or recipient organisa-
      tions.  In this case, the second, third, and fourth data
      elements in the group (Application Sender's Identification;
      Application Recipient's Identification and Date/Time of Trans-
      mission) could contain identical data to that contained in
      the comparable fields in the UNB interchange header segment
      (i.e. Transmission Sender; Transmission Recipient and Date/Time
      of preparation). For this type of usage the last data element
      in the functional group header (Application Password) would be
      omitted. Thus, the whole interchange and the functional groups
      contained within it, can be addressed point to point.

8.3.7 Functional Group trailer segment - UNE (See ISO 9735
      Annex B for detailed specification)

      In addition to the segment code UNE, this service segment
      contains two mandatory service data elements.

      The first, "Number of messages" contains a count of the total
      number of messages in the functional group.

      The second, "Functional group reference" contains the identical
      reference to that carried in the same field of the UNG header
      segment for the functional group.  Checking the two fields to
      be identical ensures that the functional group has been
      successfully received.

      A group trailer for a group of 72 messages with a group
      reference of CD1352, would be transmitted as:


8.3.8 Message structure

      A message must begin with the service segment "Message header"
      which has the segment code UNH.  A message must end with the
      service segment "Message trailer" which has the segment code
      UNT.  In addition to these two delimiting segments, a message
      may contain one or more user data segments required for the

      A message containing one user data segment to be transmitted
      can therefore be depicted as:

       . UNH segment
         |   data segment
       . UNT segment

      A message containing " n " segments to be transmitted can be
      depicted as:

       . UNH segment
         |   first data segment
         |   ...
         |   n-th data segment
       . UNT segment

      The syntax rules do not specify the order in which these user
      data segments should be transmitted within a message.  This is
      a function of message design.  The Interchange Agreement must
      contain specifications for all interchange messages and their
      segments as required by the user group.

8.3.9 Message header control segment - UNH (See ISO 9735 Annex B
      for detailed specification)

      This segment, used for both data and service messages, has the
      segment code of UNH.  It contains two mandatory service data

      - the message reference number;
      - the message identifier;

      and two conditional data elements for use with progressive
      message transfers only:

      - the common access reference
      - the status of the transfer

      The message reference can be either:

      - a program generated reference number starting at 1 for the
        first message in the interchange, and incremented by 1 for
        every successive message in the interchange; when the
        Functional Grouping technique is not being used; or

      - when Functional Grouping is being used, a program generated
        number starting at 1 for the first message in each
        functional group, and incremented by 1 for every successive
        message in each functional group; or

      - a meaningful reference number provided from the originator's
        in-house system.

      The two techniques of program generated or meaningful reference
      numbers must not be mixed within an interchange.

      The preferred technique should be specified in the Interchange
      Agreement.  Most live systems use the former techniques, with
      the numbers being program generated.

      The message identifier is a composite data element, having five
      component data elements:

      - the type of message (mandatory)
      - the version number of the message (mandatory)
      - the message release number (conditional)*
      - the controlling agency (conditional)*
      - the association assigned code (conditional)*

      * (NOTE: If Functional Grouping (See Section 8.3.6) is not being
         used, the controlling agency field becomes mandatory in
         the UNH.  If conditions demand the presence of data in
         the release number, and/or association assigned code
         fields, (see Section 7) then these too must be provided
         in the UNH if Functional Grouping is not being used.

      The use of message release number, controlling agency and
      association assigned code has been fully explained in Section 7.

      The type of message identifier is of variable length 6
      alphanumeric, e.g. INVOIC for invoice messages, or 850 for a
      purchase order transaction set (a non-UNSM message).

      The version and release numbers associated with the type of
      message are both variable length, 3 numeric.  The rules
      for the control of version and release numbers are explained in
      Section 7.

      The common access reference (CAR) is a variable length
      alpha-numeric field, with a maximum of 35 characters.  Within
      this maximum, any combination of sub-elements may also be
      specified according to user preference.  Clearly however, all
      users in an interchange group must use the same format, which
      must be specified as part of the group's interchange agreement.

      The purpose of the reference is to serve as a key to which all
      subsequent transfers of data for the same business file, can be
      related.  Therefore, the same reference must be included in the
      UNH of all related transfers.

      The status of the transfer has two component data element the
      first a variable length numeric field, with a maximum of 2
      characters, which can have the values:

      - 1 to 99 (indicating the sequence of transfers of data starting
        at 1 for the first transfer incremented by one for each
        additional transfer),

      The second sub-element is a fixed length field of one alphabetic
      character, which can have the following values:

      - C this must be present for the first transfer of data
          related to the common access reference if more than
          one transfer is foreseen, (i.e. indicating that a
          file is to be created, using the CAR as its key)

      - F this must be present for the final transfer of data
          related to earlier transfers for the same CAR key.

      The message reference, message identifier, common access
      reference, and the status of the transfer are all used for
      progressive transfer messages, related to a business file.

      The concept of progressive message transfer is that after the
      initial transmission of data related to a business file,
      successive transmissions can be used, either to upgrade or amend
      previously transmitted data related to the same business case,
      or to add new items of data.  The decision as to what data is
      transmitted at any given time is under the control of the

      Each transmission related to the same business file is linked by
      means of a unique common access reference (CAR), carried in the
      UNH segment.  This reference is imposed by the originator of
      data, (in practice, the principal), and is held as a key by all
      other partners with whom the principal is in communication.

      The trade file thus created, covers the whole set of data
      necessary to carry out the task(s) proper to a specific party
      concerned with a trade transaction.  This party receives into
      his own application the information made available by the
      sender, which may be data useful at a given time to allow
      initial processing to take place.  An example could be an
      initial booking for transport, where the full detail of the
      goods to be carried is not yet available.

      The common access reference, unique to every business file, is
      the key by which the various transmissions of progressive transfer
      messages coming from or going to any specific trade operator are
      linked together.  Within an exchange between partners, the CAR
      permits linkage of the different elements of required information
      to a series of operations connected with the same business file:


        Operation 1 - Order
        Operation 2 - Despatch advice
        Operation 3 - Delivery note
        Operation 4 - Insurance Certificate
        Operation 5 - Invoice

      From this, it can be seen that any data common to two or more of
      these operations between two parties, need only be transmitted

      The progressive message transfer technique permits the
      transmission of data which is available at a given time,
      sufficient to allow the recipient to act upon the information.

8.3.10 Message trailer control segment - UNT (See ISO 9735
       Annex B for detailed specification)

      In addition to the segment code UNT, this segment contains two
      mandatory service data elements.

      The first, "Number of segments in a message" contains a count of
      the total number of segments in the message, including the UNH
      and UNT segments.

      The second, "Message Reference Number" contains the identical
      reference to that carried in the same field of the UNH message
      header segment for the same message.

8.3.11 Section control segment - UNS (See ISO 9735 Annex B
       for detailed specification)

      Some UN Standard Messages (UNSM's) have been designed having
      three distinct logical sections, the first containing what may
      be termed user header data for the message, the second
      containing detail information (which will often repeat within
      the message), and the third containing summary information
      related to the contents of the message.

      In this type of structure, the situation may arise where
      identical user data segment(s) may be required in more than one
      of the sections, but containing different values for their data
      elements, (or in some cases overriding the data carried in the
      identical segment in the header section). In order to permit the
      precise identification and control of this situation, a control
      segment is provided to delimit the three sections.

      An example of the function of overriding data carried in an
      earlier segment could be as follows.  A purchase order message
      could specify in the header section a delivery address to which
      the (majority of) the order should be delivered.  The same
      segment containing this information could be repeated in the
      detail section, related to a specific line item of the order.
      In this case, the delivery address related to the line item
      only, overrides the address given in the header section (which
      could well apply to all of the other line items in the detail

      The section control segment has a segment tag code of UNS and
      contains one data element.  When used to delimit the
      header section from the detail section, it contains the value
      "D", and when used to delimit the detail section from the
      trailer section, it contains the value "S".

      When used, UNS segments must be specified in their correct
      positions within the relevant message(s) in the message
      directory.  If messages are designed having a different
      structure - for example, where it is only necessary to separate
      a summary section from the rest of the message - then only the
      relevant UNS segment should be used.  No more than two UNS
      segments should be used.

      An example of the use of the UNS segment is shown below:-'       ) Message Header
 ' ]
 ' ] User data segments forming
 ' ] the header section.
           UNS+D' - Section control segment separating the header and
                detail sections
 ' ] User data segments
 ' ] (including an identically
 ' ] described BBB segment)
 ' ] forming the detail section.
           UNS+S' - Section control segment separating the detail and
                summary sections
 ' ] user data segments forming
 ' ] the summary section.
 ' ]


9.1 Segment Composition

    A segment must start with a tag, which is a mandatory composite
    service data element.

    The first component data of the tag is mandatory, and contains a
    unique code to identify the segment.  Service segment codes are
    defined in the EDIFACT standard and must not be changed.

    User data segment codes are allocated by the Controlling Agency
    responsible for the message and must be unique within the
    application(s) in which they are used.

    The remaining component data elements of the tag are conditional.
    They are only used if the segment can repeat within a message, and
    when it has been stated in the message specification that control
    numbers to indicate the level at which the segment in question is
    repeating within the message are to be transmitted, (explicit
    representation).  Section 9.5.3 details the use of this technique.

    The structure of all segments therefore, is:-

    where: SEG  is the code for the segment tag.

    Segments may contain one, or several related user data elements,
    which may be either simple and/or composite, as previously
    defined. For a segment to be transmitted, it must contain data
    for at least one data element.

    The order of the data elements within the segment must be speci-
    fied in a pre-defined sequence.  For data segments, the order and
    content must be specified in the interchange application segment
    directory, along with the data segment code.

    At the segment level, every segment must be defined as being
    either mandatory or conditional within a message.  Mandatory
    segments must be transmitted if the message is present, whereas
    conditional segments may be transmitted depending upon the pre-
    agreed conditions defined in the message specification.

    Data elements within segments, and component data elements within
    composite data elements, must also be defined as being either
    mandatory or conditional.  If a data element or component data
    element is mandatory within a message, then the segment in which
    it appears must also be defined as being mandatory.  Conditional
    data elements or component data elements within such a segment may
    be transmitted depending upon the pre-agreed and specified

    A conditional segment in a message may, however, contain one or
    more data elements or component data elements which are mandatory
    when the segment is used in the message.  In this case, such data
    elements are mandatory at the segment level, rather than at the
    message level, and such component data elements are mandatory at
    the data element level.

    The syntax separators used will depend upon whether level A or
    level B syntax is being used.

9.2 Absence of Data

9.2.1 Absence of a segment

      Where no data needs to be transmitted for a conditional segment,
      the complete segment (including the segment tag) must be

9.2.2 Absence of data within a segment

      As described earlier, the order of data elements within a seg-
      ment must be specified in a pre-defined sequence.  This allows
      the receiving system to identify and process each individual
      data element.  It follows therefore, that if data is omitted at
      the beginning, or the middle of a segment--followed by data
      which is present, some means is necessary of recognizing the
      fact.  In the examples which follow, the component data elements
      of the segment tag, (which can be used to indicated explicitly,
      the level at which the segment repeats), have been suppressed,
      and therefore do not appear.

      The absence of data for one or more conditional data elements
      preceding other data in the segment which is present, is indi-
      cated by the data element separator + for each missing data

      Example:  SEG+DE1+DE2+DE3+DE4+DE5'   A segment with all data
                                           elements present.

                SEG++DE2+DE3+DE4+DE5'      A segment with DE1 omitted.

                SEG+DE1+DE2+++DE5'         A segment with DE3 and DE4

      Where no data is required for one or more conditional data
      elements at the end of a segment, the preferred technique is to
      use the segment terminator to truncate the segment following the
      last data element for which data is required:

      Example:  SEG+DE1+DE2'          A truncated segment with DE3,
                                      DE4 and DE5 omitted.

      Alternatively, data element separators can be used to indicate
      positively the absence of data for each, or some, of the data
      elements not required at the end of a segment.

      Example:  SEG+DE1+DE2+++'       A segment with DE3, DE4
                                      and DE5 omitted (no + permitted
                                      after DE5, since it is the last
                                      element in the segment)

      It should be appreciated however, that if unwanted data element
      separators at the end of segments are not truncated and there
      are a high percentage of such separators, an interchange of many
      thousands of characters could take appreciably longer to

      A further possible difficulty if there are certain types of
      telex links in the interchange chain, is that a string of 4
      consecutive plus-signs can cause some automatic telex systems
      to abort the transmission.

      The absence of data for one or more conditional component data
      elements within a composite data element is indicated using
      similar principles to those described above.  A data element
      separator must be inserted following the last component element
      for which data is required within a composite element. The
      absence of data for one or more component elements preceding
      another component element which is present, is indicated by the
      component element separator : for each missing component data

      Example:  +CE1:CE2:CE3:CE4+     A composite data element with
                                      four component elements, all

                +:CE2:CE3:CE4+        A composite data element with
                                      CE1 omitted.

                +CE1:CE2::CE4+        A composite data element with
                                      CE3 omitted.

                +CE1:CE2+             A truncated composite data
                                      element with CE3 and CE4
                ++                    A truncated composite data
                                      element with CE1, CE2, CE3 and
                                      CE4 omitted.

                SEG+:CE2:CE3:CE4+     A composite data element
                                      following a segment tag with CE1

9.3 Suppression of Non-significant Characters

    To increase efficiency of transmission and to limit processing
    overheads at reception, it is recommended that only the
    significant characters of data elements and component data
    elements defined as being variable length for the interchange
    application, should be transmitted.

    If in an in-house file, a fixed numeric field of 10 digits is
    defined as variable length for the interchange segment and has
    only two significant digits "12", the leading zeros can be


    the 0000000012 form in the in-house system becomes the +12+ form
    when suppressed.

    If in an in-house file, an alphanumeric/alphabetic field of 10
    characters is defined as variable length for the interchange seg-
    ment and has only two significant characters "AB", the trailing
    space characters can be suppressed,

    e.g. ........AB spaces........   becomes

         +AB+                        when suppressed.

    Leading spaces must not be suppressed.

    e.g. .....spaces AB spaces.....   in the in-house system becomes

         +spaces AB+                 when suppressed.

    This can be summarised as variable length numeric fields being
    right justified and variable length alphanumeric and alphabetic
    fields being left justified.

    It should be pointed out however, that recipients must have the
    capability of accepting either suppressed or non-suppressed
    variable length data, accepting however that processing
    overheads will be increased if suppression is not used.

    Any further types of compression, for example those offered by
    some proprietary telecommunications protocols, are outside the
    scope of EDIFACT.

9.4 Negative Values

    Where negative values are required, a leading minus sign (a
    hyphen), should be transmitted before the numeric value.

     e.g.  inhouse form        1352|negative

          becomes           -1352 for transmission

    Numeric fields transmitted without a sign are assumed to be
    positive, including where the data element description has an
    implied negative value (e.g. "Debit"). It is the function of the
    in-house process after receipt to take account of this type of

9.5 Repeated and nested segments

    A common requirement for many types of message is the need to
    repeat segments.  For example, an invoice could contain a number
    of items, each item containing a product code, quantity, price,

    Sometimes several repeats of a segment can occur within an
    already repeating segment, for example, there could be several
    goods items in a container and several containers within a
    consignment.  The data elements for a goods item are grouped
    together in one repeating data segment while the details for
    each container are grouped in another repeating segment, at a
    higher level.

    There are two types of structure which can occur in such repeating
    or repeating and nested segments.  These can be defined as being
    vertical or horizontal.  To meet some more complex requirements,
    the two structures can be combined within a specific message.

    For example, a message containing no repeating segments, only
    non-repeating data segments AAA, BBB and CCC, can be expressed
    diagrammatically as follows:

                      |      |      |      |      |
          Level 0    UNH    AAA    BBB    CCC    UNT

    Each segment (including the service segments UNH and UNT) appear
    at a hierarchical level of zero, and in the transmission, each
    segment will appear only once in each message of the same type
    in character string form as:-''''UNT+5'

    For easier legibility in examples, this can also be shown as:


9.5.1 Repeating segments

    A message may also contain one (or more) segments which may
    repeat in the message.

                     |     |    |    |    |    |
    e.g. Level 0    UNH   AAA   |   BBB   |   UNT
                                |         |
         Level 1               GDS       FTX

    where data segments AAA and BBB are non-repeating segments at
    level zero, whereas GDS and FTX are repeating segments at level 1.

    Segments at Level 0 are non-repeating segments having a status
    of either M 1 or C 1.

    Segments at Level 1 are either:-

    i)   a segment which can repeat 2 or more times and which does
         not start a group of segments, or

    ii)  a segment shown as having one or more occurences, which
         starts a group.

    Segments at Levels 2 to "n" are those which appear consecutively
    below those at Levels 1 to n-1, having a hierarchical
    relationship to the segment(s) above.

    How many times they can repeat within the message is something
    which is dictated by the application for which they are
    specified, and which must be stated in the relevant message

    A repeating segment can be defined as being "Conditional",
    repeating up to a maximum of 'n' times.  If there is no data for
    such a segment, it would not appear at all in the message.

    Alternatively, a repeating segment can be defined as being
    "Mandatory" repeating up to a maximum of 'n' times.  In this case
    there must be at least one occurrence of the segment in the

    Diagrams greatly assist users in understanding message structures.
    This is particularly true with regard to the level and status of
    each segment, and the number of times each segment can appear in
    the message.

    The conventions which should be followed are that each segment in
    the diagram, (or groups of segments as will be seen later),
    should be "boxed" with the status shown in the bottom left corner
    of the box, and the maximum number of occurrences shown in the
    bottom right corner of the box.

    Using this convention, the above diagram could become:-

                 |     |    |    |    |    |
               +---+ +---+  |  +---+  |  +---+
    Level 0    |UNH| |AAA|  |  |BBB|  |  |UNT|
               |---| |---|  |  |---|  |  |---|
               |M|1| |M|1|  |  |C|1|  |  |M|1|
               +---+ +---+  |  +---+  |  +---+
                            |         |
                            |         |
                          +----+    +---+
    Level 1               |GDS |    |FTX|
                          |----|    |---|
                          |M|50|    |C|5|
                          +----+    +---+

    This implies the following structure:-

         All of the segments, if they appear, must appear in the order

         UNH is mandatory and must appear once in the message

         AAA is mandatory and must appear once in the message

         GDS is a repeating segment at Level 1, it must appear at
             least once in the message, and can repeat
             consecutively up to a maximum of 50 times

         BBB is a conditional segment which may be omitted if it
             contains no data, or may appear only once in the message

         FTX is a repeating segment at Level 1, which may be omitted
             if there is no data for the segment, or can repeat
              concurrently up to a maximum of 5 times

         UNT is mandatory and must appear once in the message.

    The standard specification for all segments is that the segment
    tag comprises 10 component data elements.  The first is mandatory
    and contains the unique code to identify the segment.  The
    remainder are conditional and are available to carry control num-
    bers for use when required with repeating segments.

    When a segment appears at level zero in a message (i.e. it is a
    simple non-repeating segment), following the normal rules for
    truncation, all of the unused component separators following the
    segment codes are replaced by the segment tag separator.

    Any segment which can repeat within a message, can be constructed
    for output in one of two ways:

    - without the use of control numbers associated with the
      segment code (subsequently referred to in this guide as
      implicit representation of repeating segments), in which
      case, as for non-repeating segments, the unwanted
      component element separators are truncated and replaced by
      the segment tag separator, or

    - with the use of control numbers associated with the segment
      code, to specify the level at which the segment repeats,
      (subsequently referred to in this guide as explicit
      representation of repeating segments).  Use of control
      numbers is detailed in Section 9.5.3.

    It is stressed that it is the responsibility of message designers
    to decide and to state in each message specification, what form
    of representation is to be used for segments in the message which
    can repeat.  However, it is not permitted to mix the two tech-
    niques within a message.

    In current UNSM's implicit representation is specified, which is
    also the preferred technique for messages in use in and to North
    America.  Some pre-EDIFACT applications in Europe still use
    explicit representation.

9.5.2 Comparison of implicit and explicit representation

      Using a message with the following structure:

                       |     |    |    |    |    |
                     +---+ +---+  |  +---+  |  +---+
         Level 0     |UNH| |AAA|  |  |BBB|  |  |UNT|
                     |---| |---|  |  |---|  |  |---|
                     |M|1| |M|1|  |  |M|1|  |  |M|1|
                     +---+ +---+  |  +---+  |  +---+
                                  |         |
                                  |         |
                                +----+    +---+
         Level 1                |GDS |    |FTX|
                                |----|    |---|
                                |M|50|    |C|5|
                                +----+    +---+

    Assuming that there are 3 occurences of the GDS segment and one
    occurrence of the FTX segment, the message would be transmitted
    as follows, (although in a character string, rather than the
    layout used for the example):

              Implicit                          Explicit''''''''''''''''

9.5.3 Repeating groups of segments

      Within a message, two or more segments can be specified as a
      group of segments which can repeat as a group, with the group
      itself having either a Mandatory or Conditional status.  There
      may be any number of groups within a message, with a group or
      groups also appearing within another group.

      As for conditional segments, a conditional group of segments may
      be completely omitted from the message if there is no data for
      the group, (even though the group may contain one or more
      segments within it which have a mandatory status).

      If a conditional group is transmitted, the group must contain
      the segment(s) within it having a mandatory status.

9.5.4 Message branching diagrams

      Message specifications can include a branching diagram showing
      the structure of the message.  The conventions used are shown in
      the following fictitious message.


             |      |     |        |       |       |       |       |
           __|__  __|__   |        |       |       |       |     __|__
      0    |UNH|  |AAA|   |        |       |       |       |     |UNT|
           |---|  |---|   |        |       |       |       |     |---|
           |M|1|  |M|1|   |        |       |       |       |     |M|1|
           +---+  +---+   |        |     +---+     |     +---+   +---+
                          |        |     |Gr1|     |     |Gr2|
                          |        |     |---|     |     |---|
                          |        |     |C|5|     |     |M|9|
                       +----+   +----+   |---|   +---+   |---|
      1                |RFF |   |CTA |   |NAD|   |CUX|   |TRD|
                       |----|   |----|   |---|   |---|   |---|
                       |C|10|   |C|10|   |M|1|   |C|5|   |M|1|
                       +----+   +----+   +---+   +---+   +---+
                                  |                        |
                                  |                      __|__
                           _______|_______               |Gr3|
                           |      |      |               |---|
                           |      |      |               |C|5|
                         +---+  +---+  +---+             |---|
      2                  |RFF|  |CTA|  |BNK|             |NAD|
                         |---|  |---|  |---|             |---|
                         |C|6|  |C|5|  |C|5|             |M|1|
                         +---+  +---+  +---+             +---+
      3                  |DTM|

      In the above example, Group 1 is Conditional and the whole group
      (containing NAD, RFF, CTA and BNK) could either by omitted
      completely, or could repeat up to a maximum of 5 times.  Each
      occurrence of the group must contain at least the NAD segment.

      Group 2 (containing TRD and the segments in Group 3) is
      Mandatory and must appear at least once.  It could appear up to
      a maximum of 9 times.

      Within each occurrence of Group 2, Group 3 could be omitted
      completely if there were no data for the segments within the
      group, or alternatively could repeat up to a maximum of 5 times.

      For each occurrence of Group 3, the NAD segment must appear,
      while DTM may or may not appear, depending upon data being
      present for the segment.

      As can be seen, virtually any combination of horizontal and
      vertical structures for segments can be combined.

      The order in which segments must be processed is first from left
      to right, and then if necessary, from top to bottom when a
      vertical structure is encountered.  Left to right processing is
      then followed again if horizontal and vertical structures are

      Using Group 1 in the above diagram as an example, after having
      processed the segments to the left of the group in sequence, the
      first occurrence of the NAD segment (if present), would be
      followed by up to 6 occurrences of RFF, followed by up to 5 CTAs
      and up to 5 BNKs, before returning to the top of the loop.

      Once all of the occurrences of NAD had been exhausted,
      processing would continue with the next segment to the right of
      the Group 1 on the diagram (CUX).

      It follows from this therefore, than when formatting a message,
      the user's in-house system must ensure that subordinate and
      repetitive records used to construct segments are sorted into
      the correct sequence for processing.

      It can also be seen from the diagram that a group must be
      entered via a single segment.  In software terms, this segment
      is sometimes referred to as a "trigger" segment, i.e. the
      in-house record containing the data for the segment is used by
      the software as a "trigger" to start another occurrence of the
      group.  It should be born in mind however that:-

      i)  two or more different loops cannot begin at the same
          segment, at the same position in a message; and

      ii) an inner loop must be completed before returning to a
          further occurrence of the outer loop within which it

      The last point to be borne in mind, is that the levels at which
      segments appear must be shown on the left of the branching
      diagram, with the segments opposite the level number being kept
      in a horizontal line.  This become particularly important for
      understanding and checking purposes, if the message is a complex
      one with parts of the diagram being "exploded" onto another page
      of the branching diagram.


[NOTE:  This Section is being submitted initially as a separate
paper, which after approval, will be inserted].


Any user seeking advice on migration from any other interchange
standard to EDIFACT, should contact their local EDIFACT
Rapporteur's Advisory Team.

11.1 Rapporteur Advisory & Support Teams (RT's)

     It is via the RT's that maintenance procedures for the EDIFACT
     Syntax Rules, Data Element Directory, Segment Directory, and
     Message Directory will be co-ordinated, in conjunction with the
     UN/ECE Secretariat.

     The contact points for the rapporteurs currently appointed are:

     European Board for EDI Standardization (EBES):

      Mr R POWER     (Rapporteur)        Tel: +353 1 808 2000
      FORBAIRT                           Fax: +353 1 837 0172
      DUBLIN 9

     Pan American EDIFACT Board:

      Mr T. WHEEL (Rapporteur)           Tel: +1 703 767-6394
      U.S. Department of Defense,        Fax: +1 703 767-6378
      DLA-AQAC-E, 8725 John J. Kingman Road,
      Suite 2533
      Fort Belvoir, VA   22060-6221
      United States


     Central and Eastern European EDIFACT Board:

      Mr B. GEORGIEV  (Rapporteur)       Tel: +359 2 876 142
      Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce      Fax: +359 2 873 209
      & Industry
      11-a Saborna Str.
      BG-1000 SOFIA

     Australia/New Zealand Edifact Board:

      Mr H. Bates      (Rapporteur)      Tel: +61 51 55 34 59
      Box 635                            Fax: +61 51 55 34 58
      Victoria 3909

     Asian EDIFACT Board

      Mr K Itoh        (Rapporteur)      Tel: +81 3 437 61 35
      JASTPRO                            Fax: +81 3 437 61 36
      Daiichi-Daimon Bldg.
      2-10-1 Shibadaimon, Minato-ku
      Tokyo 105

     African EDIFACT Board

      Mr. P. MOUBELET-BOUBEYA            Tel: +241 77 47 70
      Cabinet du Secretaire Generale     Fax: +241 76 58 38
      du Gouvernement
      B.P. 91

Home          Back